Biden

It’s a relief to know that Obama didn’t adhere to the petty fixations of the media on this one. Substantively, Biden was by far the best choice I’ve heard to be vetted. The fact that his only notable flaw is that he’s a bit of an irresponsible yapper (something with which I wholeheartedly sympathize) paled in comparison to other choices that wouldn’t balance the ticket or lend appeal where Obama really requires it.

Also, why the surprise that Obama didn’t vet Hillary, his most vicious, prominent, and prone to low blows critic on either side of the primary? That ticket may have had aesthetic appeal to the storybook set, or assuage Hillary’s crazed, spiteful contingency that would rather vote against every one of their interests by choosing the guy who has barely anything in common with their candidate, but in the oval office Hillary+Obama would have been anything but a “dream”.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Who’s the most prominent sleazy cheat? John McCain.

It’s interesting that the Drudge Report, which is having a field day with the recent John Edwards disaster, juxtaposes its articles about his confession with an ad to donate to John McCain. By “interesting” of course, I mean “delicious”.

Yes, it’s likely you didn’t know that McCain cheated on his first wife (and not just with Cindy, whom he married five weeks after his divorce with Carol)

Hmm…but how is it that something like multiple affairs while married (to a wife who raised your three children while you were in a prison camp and who didn’t tell you about her severe injuries from a car accident to keep you from worrying), which assaults his integrity, hasn’t been mentioned much at all in the election  by newspapers and their many investigative pieces. They’ll try to analyze anything that can be construed as negative in Obama’s pristine history, but something so obviously corrupt as extramarital affairs in McCain’s is left out of the rosy picture. Of course, the Grey Lady had that specious lobbyist peice, but McCain’s history is not only more verifiable, but jucier.

But of course, the lack of coverage couldn’t be because John McCain can do no wrong! According to McCain’s sulky, jealous, and petulant ads, the media loves Obama.

Now, this post isn’t at all denying the übersleaziness of one John Edwards, who cheated on his terminally ill wife (remission or not, she still had cancer). Really it just restores my faith in our political system, run by arrogant, privileged men.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Hardball

Last Thursday I cut out of work early to trek out to NBC Studios. It was part of a series of events hosted by the Institute of Politics with Harvard students interning in the area. Although I’m not doing an IOP internship, I’m happy to jump on the wagon, especially since my first–and last–event was definitely one of the more interesting of the summer. We lotteried to attend a taping of the MSNBC show “Hardball with Chris Matthews” and then chat with the star and his wife, Kathleen Matthews. I think 47 signed up but there was only room for 15, my luck.

The taping itself was an interesting segue to the chat. Tom Ridge, who is a celebrity in his own right, was a guest that day. Although I confess that I don’t quite remember much of what he said during the program, he wore a pair of spectacular red shoes that Abby and I couldn’t take our eyes off of. Ryan Lizza of The New Yorker also appeared later in the episode, wearing jeans and scuffed casual shoes along with his suit jacket (I guess no one can tell on television anyway.) Lizza made a somewhat disappointingly empty polemical argument against the general media approval of Obama’s Berlin speech earlier that day. Maybe my perception is a bit skewed against him though, since set against the other guests of the day, Lizza looked barely older and significantly more ornery than the motley assortment of college students huddled across the stage. Matthews later told us that, though Obama’s venue and ambitious trip may have appeared to be products of overconfidence, he thought the speech itself was fantastic.

After the taping, Both Chris and Kathleen Matthews met with us in his large corner office, which was filled with obscure political artifacts (e.g. a flag that was a relic of the Whiskey Rebellion), photos of Chris Matthews with famous figures from his years on Capitol Hill, and evidence of later success as a cable news personality.

Both of the Matthews’ spoke with us at length about politics. Given the fact that shortly thereafter I would begin interning at a place that named Chris Matthews “Misinformer of the Year” and keeps a beat on his verbal indiscretions, and also given the fact that I watch Harball and don’t quite like the loudmouthed, stubborn caricature he portrays, I hadn’t realized how much experience Matthews had in government and policy before this meeting. In fact, the Matthews couple was politically aware in a way that reminded me that many pundits and personalities have much more depth and nuance in their views than they choose to portray. It doesn’t make their programs any more nuanced or informative, but I understand why they make them sensational. People would rather see a brawl between pundits than a friendly chat among friends. Kathleen was also a pretty impressive woman, though it was interesting to see how the journalist in her (she was an anchor for the local ABC affiliate for a long time) reconciled itself with the PR and business world she is now a part of. (Mrs. Matthews left ABC News’ Washington affiliate to be Executive Vice President of Global Affairs for Marriott. She had apparently been in Dubai earlier this month).

Their speeches where perhaps a bit more careful than they would otherwise have been, since there was a reporter in the room who was covering Matthews for a profile. I asked the reporter some questions about his story later (I tend to gravitate toward journalists rather than their subjects) and got his card so that I could look up the piece. Throughout our time in the office, he was easy to miss and managed to draw minimal attention to himself and his enormous camera. I later learned that he’d been covering capitol hill for 13 years.

Overall the event was interesting, and would have been better if the two overzealous and arrogant freshmen had elected to stay home rather than ask unnecessarily rude questions. We weren’t, after all, on Hardball ourselves.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Giles’ “10 Commandments for Classy Girls”

I wonder if he has “10 Commandments for Classy Guys” in the works, or “Classy Neocon Columnists” for that matter. I also wonder if it admonishes one for squealing with delight at the memory of grinding someone’s face into the cement and using unsavory terms such as “bumping uglies”, “slut”, “skank”, or “whore” as Mr. Giles does with such reckless abandon.

link to Giles “10 Commandments”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

cringe

A reporter gets up close; forgets a little thing called “dignity”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

LA Times continues downward spiral; Tupac Lives

The LA Times recently fired 150 writers, including Pulitzer Prize-winning Chuck Philips, who had been pegged as an incorrigible tease after giving Tupac fans both the sweet, sweet closure and the blockbuster conspiracy their hero deserved.

The result of his gaffe? Speculation about Tupac’s secret compound in Cuba will continue to haunt fans, perhaps forever.

Meanwhile, reporting of the LA Times has become uncannily reminiscent of the kind of drama pieces one finds in BBC World reports about cities under siege.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

“Controversy”? “Offensive”?

A belated comment on the recent (but, with respect to the pace of the CNN set, ancient) flap over a rather unsurprising New Yorker cover, pictured below:

I think that we’re overlooking a pretty crucial point here. Even most cursory knowledge of the New Yorker’s, and this artist’s, past provocative covers or, moreover, its absolute love affair with Obama (Hendrik Hertzberg may as well be the treasurer of the Obama editorial fan club), makes this kind of media explosion seem absurd, if not surprising.  It’s doubtful that the satire would be lost on The New Yorker’s readership.

The controversy relies entirely on the idea that many Americans are intellectually lazy enough to not only look at the cover and let our flaccid minds draw absurd conclusions, but that we would be swayed without so much as flipping to the table of contents.  Many of the arguments that I’ve heard against the cartoon, too many of which went unchallenged, revolve around an elitist assumption that of course, we (the few) understand, but they (the masses) couldn’t handle something so complex as irony.

It’s not in the style of the New Yorker to try to pander to the lowest common denominator, but rather to be fairly provocative.  In this tradition, the cover performed perhaps too well.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

> stuff white people like

An ancient relic of web satire, yet one of classic proportions and superior execution.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Excuse me while I whip this out

It’s only fitting that my first blog-related anxiety begins at the beginning: the title. My original concept involved entitling this blog “pop culture pastiche”. But alas, the term “pastiche” smacked of a kind of literary snobbishness from which I’d prefer to refrain, really. Come to think of it, “potpourri” probably has the same level of pretension given that they’re both French and lend themselves to myriad forms of mispronounciation. But I’ll keep the title because a.) I would have to start an entirely new blog and honestly I’m just not up to that, and b.) As mildly anxious as I may be about the title, it still fits and is slowly growing on me as I type.

Now about the blog itself.

As I doubt that I am interested enough in the happenings of my own life to publicly blog about them, and as I have difficulty limiting myself to mandates narrow enough so that I can claim some authoritative knowledge, I’ve decided to devote this forum to analyzing, parsing, and musing about an absurdly ambitious behemoth of a topic: all things pop culture. This includes modern literature, films, music, television, and–begrudgingly-perhaps a smattering of celebrity happenings, if I find it to be indicative of something more relevant and interesting. This blog is not meant to be exhaustive or contemporary by any measure, as the motley assortment of posts will throw caution and chronology to the wind.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized